<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nike &#8211; swoosh or no swoosh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:21:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shyam</title>
		<link>http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Shyam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abhinayachandra.com/?p=261#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Yes I will buy Nike irrespective of the position of the swoosh. But without swoosh  - NO. The brand will remain with me as long as it keeps providing whatever is expected out of it (taken for granted aspects of the brand). Then only things like swoosh and their display on the product would bother me. Agreed that swoosh has got emotions attached to it, but these emotions emanate from the core of the brand - design and comfort. To me, swoosh symbolizes the associations of the brand values and not vice-versa. 

One thing that struck me here was the loyalty part. I am loyal to the complete NIKE and not to its parts. Not just swoosh, not just comfort (might opt for lotto) , not just design (might go for Puma then), but all of them together. And as far as the case of  engraving the swoosh inside or outside is concerned, I would be least bothered but would not suggest Nike to do that. I won&#039;t mind if swoosh on the outer surface fetches some recognition, I would be happy to earn that instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I will buy Nike irrespective of the position of the swoosh. But without swoosh  &#8211; NO. The brand will remain with me as long as it keeps providing whatever is expected out of it (taken for granted aspects of the brand). Then only things like swoosh and their display on the product would bother me. Agreed that swoosh has got emotions attached to it, but these emotions emanate from the core of the brand &#8211; design and comfort. To me, swoosh symbolizes the associations of the brand values and not vice-versa. </p>
<p>One thing that struck me here was the loyalty part. I am loyal to the complete NIKE and not to its parts. Not just swoosh, not just comfort (might opt for lotto) , not just design (might go for Puma then), but all of them together. And as far as the case of  engraving the swoosh inside or outside is concerned, I would be least bothered but would not suggest Nike to do that. I won&#8217;t mind if swoosh on the outer surface fetches some recognition, I would be happy to earn that instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sayed Khadri</title>
		<link>http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Sayed Khadri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abhinayachandra.com/?p=261#comment-171</guid>
		<description>interesting analysis.
it doesn&#039;t matter where they put the SWOOSH. The important thing here is quality, if the quality is same then I can buy shoe, no matter where they put swoosh. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting analysis.<br />
it doesn&#8217;t matter where they put the SWOOSH. The important thing here is quality, if the quality is same then I can buy shoe, no matter where they put swoosh. <img src='http://www.abhinayachandra.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piyush Agarwal</title>
		<link>http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Piyush Agarwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abhinayachandra.com/?p=261#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Hii....stumbled upon this post via indivine...

Quite an interesting analysis...though I am not in branding...have been related to consumers and their thinking process for a long time courtesy family busines..

It always amazes me on how a consumer comes to a conclusion of buying a product...the different factors that make him make that purchase.. Some of them so weird that the manufacturer would never looked at the product that way!

I guess you earned yourself a regular at your blog in my form... will check out other posts soon..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hii&#8230;.stumbled upon this post via indivine&#8230;</p>
<p>Quite an interesting analysis&#8230;though I am not in branding&#8230;have been related to consumers and their thinking process for a long time courtesy family busines..</p>
<p>It always amazes me on how a consumer comes to a conclusion of buying a product&#8230;the different factors that make him make that purchase.. Some of them so weird that the manufacturer would never looked at the product that way!</p>
<p>I guess you earned yourself a regular at your blog in my form&#8230; will check out other posts soon..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sudhir Pai</title>
		<link>http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudhir Pai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abhinayachandra.com/?p=261#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Swoosh or no swoosh, I wouldn&#039;t buy Nike anymore. It&#039;s not as alluring as it used to be back in &#039;98, when it was finally launched in India, and i bought my first pair which lasted 3 years. I bought another two pairs till i had one really bad experience with their floaters. I see their quality has dropped quite a bit since i bought my first pair. my loyalties now are distributed fairly between Puma, Converse, Lotto, Fila and looking forward to buy a pair of Asics running shoes. I dont mind the Nike gear though, but i&#039;m not so kicked about their shoes anymore. I guess good advertising or good branding can only do so much for a not-so-good product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swoosh or no swoosh, I wouldn&#8217;t buy Nike anymore. It&#8217;s not as alluring as it used to be back in &#8217;98, when it was finally launched in India, and i bought my first pair which lasted 3 years. I bought another two pairs till i had one really bad experience with their floaters. I see their quality has dropped quite a bit since i bought my first pair. my loyalties now are distributed fairly between Puma, Converse, Lotto, Fila and looking forward to buy a pair of Asics running shoes. I dont mind the Nike gear though, but i&#8217;m not so kicked about their shoes anymore. I guess good advertising or good branding can only do so much for a not-so-good product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhinaya Chandrasekhar</title>
		<link>http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhinaya Chandrasekhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abhinayachandra.com/?p=261#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Hi Heena

Thanks for dropping by. Personally, I belong to the same school of thought as you.

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#039;0 which is not a hashcash value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Heena</p>
<p>Thanks for dropping by. Personally, I belong to the same school of thought as you.</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#8217;0 which is not a hashcash value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhinaya Chandrasekhar</title>
		<link>http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhinaya Chandrasekhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abhinayachandra.com/?p=261#comment-167</guid>
		<description>lol. I agree they are expensive.

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#039;0 which is not a hashcash value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol. I agree they are expensive.</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#8217;0 which is not a hashcash value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Nike – swoosh or no swoosh &#124; Brand Touchpoints -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Nike – swoosh or no swoosh &#124; Brand Touchpoints -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abhinayachandra.com/?p=261#comment-165</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by abhinaya_ch, Suraj. Suraj said: RT @abhinaya_ch: Brand Touchpoints: Nike - swoosh or no swoosh http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/ [...]

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#039;s server IP (208.74.66.43) doesn&#039;t match the comment&#039;s URL host IP (74.112.128.10) and so is spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by abhinaya_ch, Suraj. Suraj said: RT @abhinaya_ch: Brand Touchpoints: Nike &#8211; swoosh or no swoosh <a href="http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/" rel="nofollow">http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/</a> [...]</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#8217;s server IP (208.74.66.43) doesn&#8217;t match the comment&#8217;s URL host IP (74.112.128.10) and so is spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heena</title>
		<link>http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Heena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abhinayachandra.com/?p=261#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Wow, good analysis. Just a positioning change brings about such a change in consumer attitude, you explained it quite well with various respondents. Personally, I would go for it without the swoosh! Since I do not believe in &#039;Brand Value&#039; but more in Brand quality and I know Nike shoes are good in quality.

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#039;0 which is not a hashcash value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, good analysis. Just a positioning change brings about such a change in consumer attitude, you explained it quite well with various respondents. Personally, I would go for it without the swoosh! Since I do not believe in &#8216;Brand Value&#8217; but more in Brand quality and I know Nike shoes are good in quality.</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#8217;0 which is not a hashcash value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal</title>
		<link>http://www.abhinayachandra.com/2010/01/nike-swoosh-or-no-swoosh/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abhinayachandra.com/?p=261#comment-160</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t until they reduce the price by 70 %... lol

would you go on a date with a guy who has got his teeth engraved on his eyebrows ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t until they reduce the price by 70 %&#8230; lol</p>
<p>would you go on a date with a guy who has got his teeth engraved on his eyebrows ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

